Alternative

Hacker Bot vs StackHawk

Developer-centric DAST with CI/CD native integration. How does it compare to Hacker Bot's black-box approach?

TL;DR

Both StackHawk and Hacker Bot are developer-focused security tools—but with different approaches. StackHawk integrates into your CI/CD pipeline with OpenAPI-driven testing. Hacker Bot takes a black-box adversarial approach with GitHub PR annotations and proof-of-exploit evidence.

Choose StackHawk if you want API-first testing tightly coupled to your pipeline.
Choose Hacker Bot if you want real adversary simulation with transparent pricing.

Feature Comparison

FeatureHacker BotStackHawk
Pricing TransparencyPublic, from $59/moSales engagement required
GitHub IntegrationPR annotations & checksCI/CD pipeline focused
API DiscoveryAutomaticAutomatic + OpenAPI
Testing ApproachBlack-box adversarialDAST with shift-left
GraphQL SupportYesYes
gRPC SupportComing soonYes
Proof of ExploitYes, with evidenceContextual remediation
Setup ComplexityDomain verification onlyPipeline configuration

Where StackHawk Shines

  • Automatic API attack surface discovery with deep API support
  • Designed to fit directly into CI/CD pipelines
  • Rapid incremental scanning for pull requests
  • Strong REST, GraphQL, and gRPC coverage

Where StackHawk Falls Short

  • Pricing typically requires sales engagement
  • May require deeper onboarding for complex architectures
  • Less focused on proof-of-exploit evidence
  • More configuration overhead than domain-based testing

Choose StackHawk If...

  • You need gRPC testing today
  • OpenAPI-driven testing fits your workflow
  • You prefer pipeline-first integrations
  • You have complex API architectures

Choose Hacker Bot If...

  • You want real adversary simulation
  • Transparent pricing matters
  • GitHub PR annotations are your workflow
  • You value proof-of-exploit evidence

Try the Black-Box Approach

See how Hacker Bot finds what traditional DAST misses.

No credit card required • 7-day Pro trial included